 |
Introduction to Sustainable Development for Engineering and Built Environment Professionals
Unit 2 - Learning the Language
Lecture
8: Green Chemistry and Engineering - Benign by Design
Chemical
engineers have much to contribute in a world that
is moving towards sustainability. Indeed our role
is somewhat unique. We possess a detailed knowledge
of process engineering coupled with an understanding
of novel science and technology across a broad
range of disciplines. Chemical engineers can utilise
this potent mix of skills to develop new approaches
to some of our most challenging global problems…
We are already seeing the influence of the new
forces at work on our profession. Leading educational
and research institutions, such as Oxford University,
have introduced sustainable development priorities
in chemical engineering education, focusing on
hydrogen as fuel, emissions reduction, sequestration,
photo-voltaics, and life cycle analysis.
Dr Robin Batterham, President International
Council of Chemical Engineering, 2005[1]
To
provide an overview of how chemical engineers, often
working with chemists, are applying Green Chemistry
and Green Engineering principles to play a key role
in assisting business, the economy and society achieve
sustainable development.
Collins,
T. (2001) ‘Toward
Sustainable Chemistry’, Science,
vol 291, pp 48-49. Accessed 3 January 2007.
Hargroves, K. and Smith, M.H. (2005) The Natural
Advantage of Nations: Business Opportunities, Innovation
and Governance in the 21st Century, Earthscan,
London:
- Chapter
3: Asking the Right Questions Table 3.2 (1 page),
p 49.
- Chapter
3: Asking the Right Questions Table 6.6 (2 pages),
pp 52-53.
- Chapter
6: Natural Advantage and the Firm (1 page), p
97.
1. Advances in the science of chemistry and chemical
engineering have unleashed new ways to improve people’s
quality of life and improve global prosperity. The
products of the global chemical industry are worth
US$1500 billion annually, and account for approximately
nine percent of world trade in manufactured goods.
2. While it is true that the
chemical industry has contributed significantly
to increased prosperity globally and improved quality
of life, it has come at a cost, as Rachel Carson’s
classic publication Silent Spring[2]
demonstrated, with chemicals, there are risks.
Estimates of the costs of cleaning up existing hazardous
waste sites range in the hundreds of billions of
dollars. Cleaning up chemical messes is growing
ever more costly.
3. Chemical engineers are in a position to make
a significant contribution to achieving sustainable
development profitably in numerous ways through
contributing to sustainable chemical plant design,
improving process operation, eliminating the need
for toxic chemical usage and dramatically reducing
waste.
4. Chemical engineers, practising Green Chemistry
and green chemical engineering principles, have
the potential to play a significant role to help
achieve sustainability. This is because chemical
processes underpin all forms of industry. The key
role of chemical engineers to achieve sustainable
development is recognised by numerous chemical and
chemical engineering organisations[3]
and by many chemical companies.
5. In 2001, in Melbourne Australia 20 national chemical
engineering institutional bodies committed to sustainability
through the Melbourne Communiqué. This lecture
seeks to overview the latest insights in how chemical
engineers can truly help society achieve ecological
sustainability and thus fulfil their commitment
made in the Melbourne Communiqué.
6. As Terry Collins wrote in Science,[4]
chemical engineers and chemists have a huge role
to play in at least three significant areas:
-
First, renewable energy technologies will be
the central pillar of a sustainable high-technology
civilisation. Chemists can contribute to the
development of the economically feasible conversion
of solar into chemical energy and the improvement
of solar to electrical energy conversion.[5]
-
Second, the reagents used by the chemical industry,
today mostly derived from oil, must increasingly
be obtained from renewable sources to reduce
our dependence on fossilised carbon. This important
area is beginning to flourish, but unfortunately
there is not the room to cover it in detail
in this portfolio.
- Third,
polluting technologies must be replaced by benign
alternatives. This field is receiving considerable
attention, but the dedicated research community
is small and is merely scratching the surface
of an immense problem.
7. As discussed in the previous lecture this field
also has a key role to play in operationalising
Biomimicry. But also chemical engineers, chemists
and the chemical industry are realising that Biomimicry
offers a remarkable strategy for innovation. The
UK Chemical Industry acknowledged this in their
Vision for the Sustainable Production and Use
of Chemicals[6]
where they stated, ‘It is very difficult
to achieve step-change improvements in environmental
and economic performance through incremental improvements
in conventional production technologies. For a growing
number of chemical companies, inspiration is coming
from Biomimicry.’
8. The Green Chemistry and Green Engineering ideas
and initiatives that are now prominent globally
began through the pioneering work of people like
Paul Anastas, known as the father of Green Chemistry
and Michael Braungart, co-author of Cradle to
Cradle. Globally there are now significant
networks, research institutions, companies, and
government agencies working on Green Chemistry and
green chemical engineering.
9. In Green Chemistry and Green Engineering, an
ideal chemical reaction (or set of reactions) would
have the following characteristics: [7]
-
Simplicity
-
Safety
-
High yield and selectivity
-
Energy efficiency
-
Use of renewable and recyclable reagents and
raw materials.
Therefore in achieving and implementing such reactions
in industry, chemical engineering is set to make
a profound contribution to sustainable development.
10. This lecture will provide an overview of some
examples of where Green Chemistry and Green Engineering
principles are being applied. Just a sample of some
of the areas where such principles are being applied
include:
- Toxics
in the Environment: designing chemical
products that are inherently less toxic and
‘benign by design’.[8]
This also includes designing chemical systems
to produce consumer products that require less
energy, produce less or no toxins and are then
reusable or recyclable.
- Energy
Production: providing alternative means
of energy production through, for example, using
materials developed for photovoltaic cells and
the enabling technologies to make the manufacturing
of hydrogen fuel cells more feasible.[9]
- Resource
Depletion: using biowastes to develop alternatives
to current natural resources experiencing rapid
depletion. Nanotechnologies could help to improve
our ‘materials economy’, providing
the same performance with less material.[10]
- Sustainable
Food Production: using agricultural chemistry
to develop pesticides that do not harm or persist
in the environment, and more effective and less
chemical fertilisers.[11]
- Climate
Change: using materials such as polymers
and cement to absorb CO2, thereby improving
performance while also acting as a ‘sink’
for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Infrastructure
surfaces (such as roads and building walls)
can also be designed at the molecular level
to absorb CO2 emissions while improving performance.[12]
11. The new objective is to achieve Green Chemistry
and Green Engineering that is ’benign by design’
when inventing new processes, or when addressing
manufacturing problems associated with ‘end-of-pipe’
treatment.[13]
| |
Brief
Background Information |
In
2001, in Melbourne Australia 20 national chemical
engineering institutional bodies committed to sustainable
development through the Melbourne Communiqué,
stating that,[14]
In meeting society’s needs we are committed
to designing processes and products that are innovative,
energy-efficient and cost-effective, and that
make the best use of scarce resources. We are
committed to the highest standards of personal
and product safety. We seek to eliminate waste
and adverse environmental effects in the development,
manufacture, use and eventual disposal of the
products of society.
The Melbourne Principles were Agreed in Melbourne
at the Sixth World Congress of Chemical Engineering,
September 27, 2001, and signed by: the Czech Society
of Chemical Engineering; Canadian Society for Chemical
Engineering; Institution of Chemical Engineers;
Society of Chemical Engineers New Zealand; South
African Institution of Chemical Engineers; European
Federation of Chemical Engineering; Asian Pacific
Confederation of Chemical Engineering; Mexican Institute
of Chemical Engineers IMIQ; Chinese Institute of
Chemical Engineers (Chinese Taipei); Inter-American
Confederation of Chemical Engineers; TMMOB, Chemical
Engineering Chamber of Turkey; American Institute
of Chemical Engineers; DECHEMA Society of Chemical
Engineering and Biotechnology; Institution of Chemical
Engineers in Australia; Society of Chemical Engineers,
Japan; Institution of Engineers (Australia); Hong
Kong Institution of Engineers; Socièté
de Chimie Industrielle; Chemical Industry and Engineering
Society of China; and Socîèté
Français de Gènie des Procèdés
In this lecture we will overview the latest insights
in how chemical engineers can truly help society
achieve ecological sustainability. The commitment
outlined here is significant and timely. It is literally
impossible to achieve ecological sustainability
without the active involvement of chemical engineers.
Sustainable Chemistry – Green
Chemistry
Green Chemistry can be defined as ‘the design
of chemical products and processes that reduce or
eliminate the use and generation of hazardous substances’.[15]
Green Chemistry practices are governed by 12 Principles:[16]
-
Prevention: It is better to prevent waste
at the outset than to treat or clean it up.
-
Atom Economy:
Synthetic methods require maximal use of all
materials in the chemical process into the final
product.
-
Less Hazardous Chemical Syntheses: Synthetic
methods should be designed to contain little
or no toxic materials hazardous to human health
and the environment.
-
Designing Safer Chemicals: Chemical
products should be designed for safety as well
as performing their intended function.
-
Safer Solvents and Auxiliaries: The use
of auxiliary substances (e.g. solvents, separation
agents) should be kept at a minimum.
-
Design for Energy Efficiency: The economic
and environmental impacts associated with the
energy requirements for chemical processes should
be recognised and minimised; where permissible
chemical processes should be conducted in ambient
pressure and temperature.
- Use
of Renewable Feedstocks: Raw materials sourced
from renewable feedstocks should be used wherever
technically and economically practicable.
- Reduce
Derivatives: Unnecessary derivisation (eg.
temporary modification of physical/chemical
processes) should be minimised or avoided if
possible, as such steps can generate waste through
the use of additional reagents.
- Catalysis:
Catalytic reagents are superior to stoichiometric
reagents.
-
Design for Degradation: Chemical products
should be designed for decomposition into benign
substances at the end of their functional life,
to prevent their persistence in the environment.
-
Real-time analysis for Pollution Prevention:
Analytical methodologies that allow for real-time,
in-process monitoring and control should be
used in order to avoid the formation of hazardous
substances.
-
Inherently Safer Chemistry for Accident Prevention:
Substances and the form of a substance used
in a chemical process should be chosen to minimise
the potential for chemical accidents, including
releases, explosions, and fires.
The Global Green Chemistry Network
There are currently over 25 research institutions
across Europe, the UK, North America, South America,
West Africa and India who are focused on the development
of sustainable chemistry. The Centre for Green Chemistry[17]
in the School of Chemistry at Monash University
(Australia) is in the forefront of innovation in
Green Chemistry. Established in January 2000, with
the goal of providing a fundamental scientific base
for future green chemical technology, the Centre
has a primary focus on Australian industry and Australian
environmental problems. Among emerging Green Chemistry
centres worldwide, the Australian Centre is noteworthy
for its broad spectrum of research interests, including
benign technologies for corrosion inhibitors, gold
processing, and greener reaction media for chemical
synthesis, to name a few.
The 12 Green Chemistry Principles, and the field
of knowledge that is growing based upon them, are
helping to guide chemists and chemical engineers
in their efforts to assist industry in its drive
towards sustainability. The Green Chemistry principles
and this new field of knowledge are helping to guide
efforts in the following areas:
-
Green Chemistry seeks to achieve waste reduction
through improved atom economy[18]
(that is, reacting as few reagent atoms as possible
in order to reduce waste) and reduced use of
toxic reagents for the production of environmentally
benign products.
-
Green Chemistry and Green Chemical Engineering
seeks to utilise catalysts to develop more efficient
synthetic routes and reduce waste by avoiding
processing steps.[19]
Synthetic strategies now employ benign solvent
systems, such as ionic water,[20]
and supercritical fluids, such as carbon dioxide.[21]
- Solvent
free methods for many reactions are also being
tested, as have biphasic systems, to integrate
preparation and product recovery. For example,
phases of liquids that separate are going to
be much easier to recover without needing an
additional extractive processing step.
-
In addition, there has been significant research
into utilising high-temperature water and microwave
heating, sono-chemistry (chemical reactions
activated by sonic waves) and combinations of
these and other enabling technologies.[22]
-
Much work is also being done to harness chemicals
for common reactions from renewable biomass
feedstocks. For instance in 1989, Harry Szmant[23]
reported that 98 percent of organic chemicals
used in the lab and by industry are derived
from petroleum. The Netherlands Sustainable
Technology Development[24]
project has found that, in principle, there
is sufficient biomass production potential to
meet the demands for raw organic chemicals from
these renewable chemical feedstocks.[25]
Case Study: Argonne National Lab
An excellent example of Green Chemistry is the technology
developed by Argonne National Lab, a winner of the
1998 USA President’s Awards for Green Chemistry.[26]
Every year in the United States alone, an estimated
3.5 million tons of highly toxic, petroleum-based
solvents are used as cleaners, degreasers, and ingredients
in adhesives, paints, inks, and many other applications.
More environmentally friendly solvents have existed
for years, but their higher costs have kept them
from wide use.
A technology developed by Argonne National Labs
produces non-toxic, environmentally friendly ’green
solvents’ from renewable carbohydrate feedstocks,
such as corn starch. This discovery has the potential
to replace about 80 percent of petroleum-derived
cleaners, degreasers and other toxic and hazardous
solvents. The process makes low-cost, high-purity
ester-based solvents, such as ethyl lactate, using
advanced fermentation, membrane separation, and
chemical conversion technologies. These processes
require very little energy and eliminate the large
volumes of waste salts produced by conventional
methods. This method of producing biodegradable
ethyl lactate solvents can also cut the price by
up to 50 percent, from US$1.60-$2.00 per pound to
less than US $1.00 per pound. Overall, the process
uses as much as 90 percent less energy and produces
ester lactates at about 50 percent of the cost of
conventional methods.
The lactate esters from this process can also be
used as ’platform’ building blocks to
produce polymers and large-volume biodegradable
oxy-chemicals, such as propylene glycol and acrylic
acid. Markets for these biodegradable polymers and
oxy-chemicals might soon surpass those of green
solvents.
Industry Take Up
Costs of environmental remediation activities are
in the range of US$100 billions. Many individual
chemical companies have budgets for environmental
compliance programs that are as large as their budgets
for research and development. A high priority is
now placed on developing solutions to avoid waste
remediation costs, through waste prevention. Many
chemical and related industries realise that re-designing
waste out of the initial process will not only save
significant costs but can also result in greater
profits. The chemical industry has turned to research
institutions for guidance, utilising insights from
the new fields of Green Chemistry[27]
and Green Engineering[28].
These are new approaches to industrial chemistry
and engineering that seek to reduce or eliminate
the use or generation of hazardous substances in
the design, manufacture and application of chemical
products.
The objective is to be ’benign by design’
when inventing new processes, or when addressing
manufacturing problems associated with ‘end-of-pipe’
treatment.[29]
US Presidential Green Chemistry award winner Barry
Trost, writes,[30]
In focusing on immediate problems, the implemented
solution sometimes ignores the question of what
new problems arise as a result of the solution.
In short, solving one problem frequently creates
another… Establishing the safety of the
final end use compounds has been a key part of
the process of developing new products for some
time. On the other hand, developing the chemical
processes by which the end use products are made,
has not been a generally recognized part. As we
understand more about the broad implications of
potential solutions, the real cost becomes more
apparent and a new driver for innovation…
Making chemical manufacturing more environmentally
benign by design must now become an integral part
of the product development process.
Green Chemistry and Green Engineering offer chemical
engineers a field of expertise and knowledge of
how to do this. Since the inception of Green Chemistry[31]
in the 1990’s, its philosophies have had a
significant impact, assisting the chemical industries
to leap toward a more sustainable future. As we
will show, such exciting results and progress gives
government, industry and academia much to work together
on this century to create truly sustainable solutions.
-
Green Chemistry Institute (n.d.) Introductory
Green Chemistry Articles, comprehensive
online papers that provide an overview of the field.
Accessed 3 January 2007.
-
Anastas, P.T. and Warner, J.C. (1998) Green
Chemistry: Theory and Practice, Oxford University
Press, New York.
| |
Key
Words for Searching Online |
Green Chemistry Institute, Anastas, Green Chemistry
Principles.
[1]
Dr Robin Batterham (2006) Embracing
the challenges of chemical industry sustainability,
November 26 (accessed January 2007). (Back)
[2]
Carson, R. (1962) Silent Spring, Houghton
Mifflin, Boston. (Back)
[3]
As the Johannesburg summit approaches, chemical industry
associations including the American Chemistry Council
(ACC), the Canadian Chemical Producers Association
(CCPA), the Chemical Industries Association of the
U.K. (UKCIA), and the European Chemical Industry Council
(CEFIC) are planning their reports to delegates. (Back)
[4]
Collins, T. (2001) ‘Toward Sustainable Chemistry’,
Science, vol 291, pp 48-49. (Back)
[5]
Jones, D. (2000) ‘Hydrogen
Fuel Cells for Future Cars’, ChemMatters,
December 2000, pp 4-6. Accessed 26 November 2006.
(Back)
[6]
Forum for the Future & Chemistry Leadership Council
(2005) A vision for the sustainable production
& use of chemicals, on behalf of the Chemistry
Leadership Council. Available at http://www.chemistry.org.uk/pages/8/press/9308_chemistry.pdf.
Accessed 26 November 2006. (Back)
[7]
Allen, D.T. and Shonnard, D.R (2002) Green Engineering:
Environmentally Conscious Design of Chemical Processes,
Prentice Hall, New Jersey, Chapter 7: Green Chemistry.
(Back)
[8]
Ibid. (Back)
[9]
Lankey, R.L. and Anastas, P.T. (2002) Advancing
Sustainability through Green Chemistry and Engineering,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 4-6. (Back)
[10]
Ibid. (Back)
[11]
Ibid. (Back)
[12]
Ibid. (Back)
[13]
Anastas, P. and Williamson, T. (1998) Green Chemistry,
Frontiers in Design Chemical Synthesis and Processes,
Oxford University Press. (Back)
[14]
World Congress of Chemical Engineering (2001) Melbourne
Communiqué at the 6th World Congress of Chemical
Engineering, September 27, Melbourne. Accessed
3 January 2007. (Back)
[15]
Anastas, P., Heine, L., Williamson, T. and Bartlett,
L. (2000) Green Engineering, American Chemical
Society, November. (Back)
[16]
Anastas, P. T. and Warner, J. C. (1998) Green
Chemistry: Theory and Practice, Oxford University
Press, New York, p 30. (Back)
[17]
See The Centre for Green Chemistry in the School of
Chemistry, Monash University at http://www.chem.monash.edu.au/green-chem/.
Accessed 3 January 2007. (Back)
[18]
Trost, B. (1995) ‘Atom economy - A challenge
for organic synthesis: Homogeneous catalysis leads
the way’, Angewandte Chemie International
Edition, vol 34, p 259. (Back)
[19]
Strauss, C. (1999) ‘Invited Review. A Combinatorial
Approach to the Development of Environmentally Benign
Organic Chemical Preparations’, Australian
Journal of Chemistry, vol 52, p 83. (Back)
[20]
Breslow, R. (1998) ‘Water as a solvent for chemical
reactions’, in Anastas, P. and Williamson, T.
(2000) Green Chemistry, Frontiers in Design Chemical
Synthesis and Processes, Oxford University Press,
Chapter 13; Li, C. (2000) ‘Water as Solvent
for Organic and Material Synthesis’, in Anastas,
P., Heine, L., Williamson, T. and Bartlett, L. (2000)
Green Engineering, American Chemical Society,
November, Chapter 6. (Back)
[21]
Hancu, D., Powell, C. and Beckma, E. (2000) ‘Combined
Reaction-Separation Processes in CO2’, in Anastas,
P. Heine, L. Williamson, T. and Bartlett, L. (2000)
Green Engineering, American Chemical Society,
November, Chapter 7. (Back)
[22]
Strauss, C. (1999) 'Invited Review. A Combinatorial
Approach to the Development of Environmentally Benign
Organic Chemical Preparations', Australian Journal
of Chemistry, vol 52, p 83. (Back)
[23]
Szmant, H. (1989) Organic Building Clocks of the
Chemical Industry, Wiley, New York, p 4. (Back)
[24]
Weaver, P., Jansen, J., van Grootveld, G., van Spiegel,
E. and Vergragt, P. (2000) Sustainable Technology
Development, Greenleaf Publishers, Sheffield,
UK. (Back)
[25]
Okkerse, C. and van Bekkum, H. (1997) ‘Towards
a plant-based economy?’ In: Van Doren H.A. and
van Swaaij A.C. (eds) Starch 96 – the book,
The Carbohydrate Research Foundation, Zestec. (Back)
[26]
U.S. EPA Presidential Green Chemistry Awards (1998)
1998 Greener Reaction Conditions Award. Available
at http://epa.gov/greenchemistry/pubs/pgcc/winners/grca98.html.
Accessed 3 January 2007; Argonne National Laboratory
(n.d.) Ethyl
Lactate Solvents. Accessed 3 January 2007.
(Back)
[27]
See The Green Chemistry Institute at http://acswebcontent.acs.org/home.html.
Accessed 3 January 2007. (Back)
[28]
Anastas, P., Heine, L., Williamson, T. and Bartlett,
L. (2000) Green Engineering, American Chemical
Society, November. (Back)
[29]
Anastas, P. and Williamson, T. (1998) Green Chemistry,
Frontiers in Design Chemical Synthesis and Processes,
Oxford University Press, NY. (Back)
[30]
Quoted from the foreword to Anastas, P.T. and Williamson,
T.C. (1998) Green Chemistry, Frontiers in Design
Chemical Synthesis and Processes, Oxford University
Press, NY. (Back)
[31]
Anastas, P.T and Kirchhoff, M.M. (2002) ‘Origins,
Current Status, and Future Challenges of Green Chemistry’,
Accounts of Chemical Research, vol 35, pp
686-694, American Chemical Society. This is one of
the most recent and up to date summaries of key developments
in the field of green chemistry. (Back)

The
Natural Edge Project Engineering Sustainable Solutions
Program is supported by the Australian National
Commission
for UNESCO through the International Relations
Grants
Program of the Department of Foreign Affairs and
Trade.


|
 |