
Section
3: Achieving a Natural Advantage of Nations
|
|
1 |
The
tragedy of the commons: 35 years on |
|
2 |
Government
mechanisms |
|
3 |
The
regulatory measure response |
|
|
3.1 |
Mental models of voluntary
environmental initiatives (Bruce Paton) |
|
4 |
Voluntary
agreements: effectiveness analysis - tools,
guidelines and checklists |
|
|
4.1 |
Allars' characteristics
of effective voluntary agreements |
|
|
4.2 |
The generic Canadian pro
forma for voluntary initiatives |
|
|
4.3 |
The United Nations Environment
Programme's (UNEP's) Industry and Environment
Technical Report |
|
|
4.4 |
The Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development's (OECD's) approach |
|
5 |
Can
regulation be designed to improve competitiveness? |
|
|
5.1 |
Effective economic measures
to complement either voluntary or regulatory
approaches |
|
|
5.2 |
Natural resources |
|
|
5.3 |
Government-industry partnerships
to improve innovation |
|
6 |
From
clusters to national systems of innovation
Rob McLean with Jaya Pillia |
|
7 |
Managing
industry transitions through waves of innovation
Philip Sutton |
| |
| Chapter
12 - Towards a Deeper Understanding |
|
1 |
Markets and efficiency |
|
|
1.1 |
What is a market? |
|
|
1.2 |
How do economists define
efficiency? |
|
|
1.3 |
The classical understanding |
|
|
1.4 |
Perfect complete markets |
|
|
1.5 |
The economics of information |
|
|
1.6 |
Financial markets: what
they do and why they are fragile |
|
|
1.7 |
Anti-monopoly legislation:
competition policy |
|
2 |
Challenges to governments and
institutions (Stephen Dovers) |
|
|
2.1 |
Attributes of policy problems
in sustainability |
|
|
2.2 |
Clarifying government, governance
and institutions |
|
|
2.3 |
Available scales of sustainability
governance |
|
|
2.4 |
Scaling responses |
|
|
2.5 |
Principles and elements
of policy and institutional reform |
|
|
2.6 |
Is there 'credible commitment'
to sustainabilty? |
|
|
|
|
| Chapter
13 - National Systems of Innovation
(Paul M. Weaver) |
|
1 |
Practice makes perfect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Innovation systems are part
of today's development paradigm |
|
|
2.1 |
The challenge to innovation
systems |
|
3 |
The Dutch National Sustainable
Technology Development programme |
|
4 |
The Netherlands context |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
Recent developments |
|
5 |
Lessons from the Dutch and other
programmes |
|
6 |
Concluding remarks |
|
|
Chapter 14 - Sustainability in the Wild West
(Peter Newman) |
|
1 |
The Fremantle Declaration: 'Passing
the Torch to the Regions' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
The Western Australia State
Sustainability Strategy: is change happening?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
Process for developing the
strategy |
|
|
2.2 |
Public engagement |
|
|
2.3 |
The policy change process |
|
|
2.4 |
What have we learned? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chapter
- 15 Delivering Sustainability Through Local
Action |
|
1 |
A worldwide movement of local
governments (Wayne Wescott, Martin Brennan
and Yolande Strengers) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Sustainability Street: it's
a village out there (Vox Bandicoot and Environs
Australia) |
|
3 |
Leadership in the local government
sector: working from inside out (Valerie A.
Brown) |
|
|
3.1 |
Sustainability leadership in
the local government sector |
|
|
3.2 |
Profile of sustainability leadership |
|
|
3.3 |
'When everything is said and
done - more is said than done' |
|
|
3.4 |
Sector-wide action |
|
|
3.5 |
Sustainability advocacy in the
local government sector |
|
... Leading governments around the world are already
making significant changes in order to address the
challenges of sustainable development, seeking to
achieve progress that does not penalize future generations.
In this section of the book, we will demonstrate
that leadership in this area is no longer a political
risk and a walk into the unknown for governments.
Rather, governments can be inspired to develop a
range of new mechanisms and structures to
underpin a shift to sustainability, lead by the
experience of other leading governments illustrated
throughout this section. In Section 1 it was
reported that the Netherlands Government has funded
a five-year programme to address the challenges
of sustainable development. This project, involving
hundreds of organizations and scientists, found
that a factor of 10 to 20+ improvements in resource
productivity are possible over the next 50 years.
Better still, they have published an extensive
book on their findings that explains in detail this
landmark body of work, thus assisting other nations
to do the same. This is, however, not an isolated
initiative of government. In Germany, for example,
there is the Socio-Ecological Programme, in Austria,
the Programme on Technologies for Sustainable Development,
and in Japan there is the Zero Emissions Research
Initiative (ZERI).
The Australian Government funds a significant
percentage of the Commonwealth Scientific and
Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia’s
peak science and industry research body. CSIRO
is carrying out a comprehensive Future Scenarios
programme for Australia, analysing the country’s
material and energy flows to better understand
how resource productivity improvements can be
made. CSIRO’s Flagship programmes have been
designed partly to address the need to achieve
ecological sustainability under the themes of
preventive health, leading the light metals age,
water for a healthy country, food futures, wealth
from Australia’s oceans and energy transformed.
CSIRO states that, ‘National teamwork, collaboration
and partnership are primary ingredients for success
in science, technology and innovation. Partnerships
provide us with the critical mass to compete with
the world’s best in areas essential to our
future. Every Flagship is a partnership of leading
Australian scientists, research institutions and
commercial companies. Intense social, economic
and environmental forces are shaping Australia’s
destiny in the 21st Century. These place ever-growing
pressures on us to be globally competitive, ecologically
sustainable, socially equitable and progressive.’
This
is just the start of a wide range of government
institutional reform that is occurring globally,
at all levels of government. In Belgium, they
have further empowered their National Council
for Sustainable Development to continue its work
to encourage whole of government approaches. However,
this is not an isolated example, the International
Network for National Councils for Sustainable
Development has over 70 member countries all at
different stages of the process, and the US had
a National Council for Sustainable Development
under the Clinton/Gore administration. Today,
dictatorships are about the only countries that
do not have institutional structures within government
to help adopt a whole of government approach to
sustainable development. Dr Steve Dovers, one
of the world’s experts in institutional
change for sustainable development, considers
the Belgium case study in Chapter
12 on broad trends and lessons of institutional
reform to date. Since the challenge of achieving
sustainable development is going to be one of
the major drivers for innovation this century,
we need to consider what this means for national
systems of innovation. Paul Weaver, one of the
lead authors of the Sustainable Technology Development
(STD) project, addresses this in Chapter
13.
An
inspiring example of government institutional
reform to address the challenge of sustainable
development was mentioned briefly in Section 1,
the State Sustainability Strategy of the Western
Australian Government. There, the state/regional
government has passed into law a comprehensive
state sustainability strategy. Professor Peter
Newman, of Murdoch University, who was tasked
with facilitating this process, provides an account
of what they have achieved, and some of the lessons
of the journey, in Chapter
14. Is the WA example an isolated case? No.
Newman and his team have also been heavily involved
in assisting the development of the Network of
Regional Government for Sustainable Development
(nrg4SD). This network is comprised of increasing
numbers of state/regional/sub-national governments
from around the world, some of which already have
comprehensive sustainability strategies. The nrg4SD
began at the World Summit on Sustainable Development
(WSSD) in 2002, and now holds conferences every
six months that are hosted by state governments
around the world. This relatively new international
network is bound to succeed for many reasons,
not the least of which being that local government
internationally has beaten them to it.
There is already a significant international network
of local governments learning together how best
to achieve sustainable development known as the
International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives
(ICLEI). This organization facilitates and helps
co-ordinate an international network of local councils
globally. (ICLEI Asia-Pacific talk about their experiences
in the beginning of Chapter
15.) Emeritus Professor Val Brown, who has been
very active on local government and sustainability
issues for over two decades, writes further on these
exciting developments in local government in Chapter
15. These changes are examples of the innovative
approaches emerging from governments to address
the complex challenge of achieving sustainable development...
|
 |